Harry Potter
One thing is for sure, Daniel Radcliffe won't have to work a day in his life after the 7th movie is wrapped. Unfortunately, like Mark Hamill he may be type-cast for life, but Harry Potter ain't such a bad legacy to live with.
I went to see the 4th film yesterday, The Goblet of Fire. Overall, a very good adaptation of a very long book. It is always interesting to see how filmmakers can compress pages and chapters into a short scene, or one line in some cases.
The effects have become almost routine. There were few sequences which had a wow-factor. I thought the Buckbeak creature effects in Prisoner of Azkaban were amazing (the sound had a lot to do with it). The dragon in this movie seemed to be a cast-off from Revenge of the Sith (looked a lot like the mount which Obi-Wan rode on Utapau). I was a bit disappointed that the Skrewts were not included in the maze, rather the shrubbery came alive instead, which was NOT in the book. Damn you, Mike Newell.
Anyway, the acting is getting a little better, only they still only give Ron Weasley the one-liners. Hermione is certainly showing signs of graduating into a woman - which will be more difficult to hide in future movies. She was much more emotional, and her feelings for Ron and Harry are coming on strong. The teachers were typical, but again, not given many good lines. Alan Rickman and poor Hagrid were barely in this one. And while Michael Gambon does a good Dumbledore, he doesn't seem to have much enthusiasm for the role. At least pay homage to Richard Harris. Surely the pay can't be that bad.
Ralph Fiennes - ho hum - could have been anyone under that makeup.
Gary Oldman - in the book he shows up at the end - I guess he couldn't be pursuaded either. As long as he is contracted for the next film, as he has a big part in that story (Sirius Black in case you weren't paying attention).
I was also disappointed that we did not see the Durseleys in the start of the film. It has become a tradition to start off showing Harry living with his hateful family, especially since the book established that as long as Harry is living with his relations, he is safe from Voldemort. Perhaps the actors refused to work for such low pay as they were no doubt offered.
Finally, the music. John Williams' main theme was heard in the beginning, and hints of Williams were heard throughout the film, but it turns out most of the score was written by someone else. I realize John Williams only has so many magical themes in him, but the imposter's score had hints of Yoda's theme, Luke and Leia's theme and ET and Elliott's theme in bits and pieces. But then again, so do most of Williams' newer scores. Perhaps Lucasfilm has written software which can automatically create a John Williams-like score whenever it is called for.
I did stay for the credits, nearly 20 minutes of them. Amazing how many different collaborators work on these effects-driven movies.
So overall, I still like Prisoner of Azkaban the best, then this one as number 2, and the Chamber of Secrets is definitely my least favorite book and movie.
Was it too dark? Maybe for a 2 year old. Sure, someone dies. Whoop de do. Take your kids to see this movie, there is not much else for kids.
I do have to mention, that in the 15 minutes of previews, tv commercials and video game ads shown before the movie, it seems Hollywood is banking on computer animated movies to bring in the money. Granted some CG movies do well, but others do not.
Once again, as Mr. Lucas has proven, great effects make not a great movie.

